branches
Sometimes we can not see the forest. The technology is masking the true meaning of learning, but I fear that this is a debate that has been and will be present for a long time here.
I find that focusing the debate on the relationship between technology and learning conceal the real tragedy of elearning colleges and business schools do not teach this process to work.
In my case, I come from the world of socio-cultural and social education have had the experience of this process to work in person. We encerrábamos with groups of technicians and / or volunteers of different subjects and we analyzed our practice to improve. This conflicted with the structures where sometimes the technicians should carry out their work but managed a professional commitment to continuous improvement of their practice.
When technology began to arrive we saw the impact on collective processes of knowledge would be powerful, but would have to adapt to new conditions. One of the most important was the breaking synchrony / asynchrony caused us problems and complementary advantages. But we weakened further aspect is that with this method is losing much of the "compromise" the technician led perhaps by the urgencies of their own work system in which we operate (there who believes that lack of commitment is a sign of our time.) We have seen reaching
waves of professionals, technicians and companies and institutions to "fashion." Each has turned to the tools I knew to do and are there many types of elearning (which may one day inventory) depending on experience and experience of each. This sector
something has changed, of course, in the technology will continue. But you have to work and methodological issues in this key will be good practice, the work of all the professional reflection and exchange of ideas and experiences.
But I warn you with fashion is another danger: mystification of elearning and the predominance of a vision of elearning intentionally masked and hidden from others.
I find that focusing the debate on the relationship between technology and learning conceal the real tragedy of elearning colleges and business schools do not teach this process to work.
In my case, I come from the world of socio-cultural and social education have had the experience of this process to work in person. We encerrábamos with groups of technicians and / or volunteers of different subjects and we analyzed our practice to improve. This conflicted with the structures where sometimes the technicians should carry out their work but managed a professional commitment to continuous improvement of their practice.
When technology began to arrive we saw the impact on collective processes of knowledge would be powerful, but would have to adapt to new conditions. One of the most important was the breaking synchrony / asynchrony caused us problems and complementary advantages. But we weakened further aspect is that with this method is losing much of the "compromise" the technician led perhaps by the urgencies of their own work system in which we operate (there who believes that lack of commitment is a sign of our time.) We have seen reaching
waves of professionals, technicians and companies and institutions to "fashion." Each has turned to the tools I knew to do and are there many types of elearning (which may one day inventory) depending on experience and experience of each. This sector
something has changed, of course, in the technology will continue. But you have to work and methodological issues in this key will be good practice, the work of all the professional reflection and exchange of ideas and experiences.
But I warn you with fashion is another danger: mystification of elearning and the predominance of a vision of elearning intentionally masked and hidden from others.
0 comments:
Post a Comment